Browse Priscian

GL page
(e.g. 10, 10b; range 1–249)

Search glosses

Search in:

Priscian, Ars grammatica: book 6 (De nominatiuo et genetiuo casu)

Text of Priscian from Hertz ed., Grammatici Latini, vol. II, p. 229 (not a transcription from the St Gall manuscript).

previous page next page

The gloss you selected is highlighted in yellow.

II 229,1iter, dicimus enim huius itineris, quamuis antiqui et hoc iter iteris
II 229,2et hoc itiner itineris dixerunt. Plautus in mercatore:
II 229,3«quin tu ergo itiner exsequi meum me sinis».
II 229,4Naeuius in Lycurgo:
II 229,5«ignoti iteris sumus, tute scis»,
II 229,6quae sunt nunc heteroclita. inueniuntur tamen apud uetustissimos haec
99a11d229,6book 63232 haec: .i. nomina
II 229,7ancipitis genetiui: hic accipiter huius accipiteris et accipitris, Opiter
99a12e229,799a2book 6215 543 ancipitis: .i. is cumtubart ced dogní angenitiu
[‘i.e. it is doubtful what their genitive makes’] [analysis]
99a13f229,7book 6566[?] opiter: proprium
II 229,8Opiteris et Opitris, Maspiter Maspiteris et Maspitris, Diespiter
99a15g229,8book 655 diespiter: .i. dei pater
II 229,9Diespiteris et Diespitris. sic etiam Iuppiter Iuppiteris et Iuppitris, ut
99a15229,9book 64141 sic: .- → (99a17=229,10) debuit: .-
II 229,10Caesellio Vindici placet, debuit declinari. nam Iouis nominatiuo
99a18h229,1099a3book 64228 53 iovis: .i. ar ni iovis genitivus indí as iuppiter ciasid ruburt túas ar biid iovis cene nominativo
[‘i.e. for the genitive of Jupiter is not Jovis, though I have said it above, for Jovis is already as a nominative’] [analysis]
II 229,11quoque casu inuenitur. Caecilius in epistula:
II 229,12«nam nouus quidem deus repertus est Iouis».
99a19229,12book 64111 4121 deus: " → (99a20=229,12) iovis: " → (99a21=229,16) quo: "
II 229,13Accius in epinausimache:
99a20i229,13book 6566[?] epinausimache: nomen artis
II 229,14«lucifera lampade exurat Iouis /
99a21k229,14book 63111 543 iovis: nominativus
II 229,15arietem».
II 229,16ex quo etiam pluralem numerum Plautus protulit in Casina:
II 229,17«repente ut emoriantur humani Ioues».
II 229,18c quoque antecedente supra dictam seruant regulam, id est er in ris
99a24l229,18book 64224 [antece]dente: .i. er
II 229,19conuertunt in genetiuo, si sint communia uel in is facientia feminina, ut
II 229,20alacer alacris, acer acris. et sciendum, quod in utraque terminatione
II 229,21utriusque generis inueniuntur haec [Virgilius in VI de Anchisa dicens:
99a28m229,21book 6543 utriusque: .i. masculini ⁊ feminini
99a29n229,21book 63232 haec: nomina

 

previous page next page

Conspectus siglorum

Manuscripts

G
St Gall, Stiftsbibliothek, 904 (a. 851)
L
Leiden, Universiteitsbibliotheek, BPL 67 (a. 838)
K
Karlsruhe, Badische Landesbibliothek, Aug. perg. CXXXII (s. IXb)
E
Paris, Bibliothèque nationale, Latin 10290 (s. IXc–d)
M
Milan, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, Cod. A 138 sup. (s. IX)
T
Dublin, Trinity College, MS 229 (C.1.8) (s. XI)

Lemmata

[ ]
the enclosed part is in the preceding or following line in the MS
+
the gloss is not in the hand of the usual glossator A (in all MSS)
*
the gloss explains a corrupt lemma and/or sentence

Glosses

7
et/ocus
.i.
id est/ed-ón
├
= spiritus asper
< >
part of the gloss is illegible [note: < > sometimes also enclose later additions in the MS; these are being revised and distinguished with ( )]
[ ]
letters which should be deleted
abc
letters marked as deleted (but legible) in the MS
Rijcklof Hofman, Pádraic Moran, Bernhard Bauer, St Gall Priscian Glosses, version 2.1 (2023) <http://stgallpriscian.ie/index.php?id=6443&kP=229&kV=2> [accessed 23 November 2024]